<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Multiple choice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.latinocean.com/blog/2008/07/03/multiple-choice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.latinocean.com/blog/2008/07/03/multiple-choice/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 09:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jorge</title>
		<link>http://www.latinocean.com/blog/2008/07/03/multiple-choice/comment-page-1/#comment-11368</link>
		<dc:creator>jorge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 13:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.latinocean.com/blog/2008/07/03/multiple-choice/#comment-11368</guid>
		<description>Jye, i don't have an iPhone so won't be able to check out the LinkedIn app anytime soon. Having said that, my expectation is that in principle no plug-in will be able to resolve functional limitations at core design level (and as you point out, there are a few).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jye, i don&#8217;t have an iPhone so won&#8217;t be able to check out the LinkedIn app anytime soon. Having said that, my expectation is that in principle no plug-in will be able to resolve functional limitations at core design level (and as you point out, there are a few).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jye Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.latinocean.com/blog/2008/07/03/multiple-choice/comment-page-1/#comment-11363</link>
		<dc:creator>Jye Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 11:43:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.latinocean.com/blog/2008/07/03/multiple-choice/#comment-11363</guid>
		<description>I'm still coming to terms with LinkedIn at times.  It's limited functionality and clunky site make it a real hassle.  However recently on my blog I  discussed the fact that the new linkedin iPhone app might change all this.  Would love to hear your thoughts on it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m still coming to terms with LinkedIn at times.  It&#8217;s limited functionality and clunky site make it a real hassle.  However recently on my blog I  discussed the fact that the new linkedin iPhone app might change all this.  Would love to hear your thoughts on it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carey Eaton</title>
		<link>http://www.latinocean.com/blog/2008/07/03/multiple-choice/comment-page-1/#comment-10061</link>
		<dc:creator>Carey Eaton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 23:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.latinocean.com/blog/2008/07/03/multiple-choice/#comment-10061</guid>
		<description>Hi Jorge

You've scratched the surface here on the new netiquette. 

To my mind there are fundamentally two approaches to these networks. The first is an approach that sees value in the volume of connections. The second (and my preferred appraoch) is one that sees value in the quality / segmentation of connections. 

The netiquette thing gets dicey is when you get connection requests between 'volume' people and 'quality' people. 

Personally I can't see why anyone would want to have an online relationship with me when they don't even know me - I might be downright dangerous!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jorge</p>
<p>You&#8217;ve scratched the surface here on the new netiquette. </p>
<p>To my mind there are fundamentally two approaches to these networks. The first is an approach that sees value in the volume of connections. The second (and my preferred appraoch) is one that sees value in the quality / segmentation of connections. </p>
<p>The netiquette thing gets dicey is when you get connection requests between &#8216;volume&#8217; people and &#8216;quality&#8217; people. </p>
<p>Personally I can&#8217;t see why anyone would want to have an online relationship with me when they don&#8217;t even know me - I might be downright dangerous!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
