You can post a job ad, but it will cost you

It’s the beginning of the year and I am already disappointed.

I thought 2010 was going to be the year where significantly less job ads, print or online, were going to include phrases like:

- ‘leading multinational’ to refer to the hiring company
- ‘high calibre individual’ to refer to the candidate they want to attract
- ‘challenging and dynamic environment’ to describe work conditions

What’s the real chance to get who you really want for this role with ‘details’ like those above?

I understand the anonymity has been used to protect clients from ambulance chasers, unsolicited CV’s etc. Those protection costs though are extremely high. It will cost real money to process unsuitable applicants – for example.

You might find the right individual in that hay stack you are generating. But just in case, get your calculator out and do your numbers; your job ads might be making your advertising/sourcing process more expensive than what you imagine.

  • Jorge, I agree It still comes down to the active versus passive niche- and the psychology behind sourcing. Social Networks (I am speaking of interpersonal not the technologies) I believe are still the highest source of quality for business as well as candidate sourcing.
  • Kev thanks - i believe the statement that "networks is the best source..." still needs to be backed with a) scale and b) hard/defend-able facts. I guess we can start with better-written ads that are distributable to trusted groups online, and then measure
blog comments powered by Disqus