Archive for the ‘business’ Category

A jerk-free workplace

Monday, June 4th, 2007

It’s a bigger problem than you might think—jerks and bullies in the workplace. Research shows that they not only hinder recruiting and retention but also raise levels of client churn, damage reputations, and diminish the confidence of investors.

Interesting article from McKinsey’s on the costs of jerks and bullies in the office (need to register for free). This is perhaps more timely in the context of candidates shortages and the urge to recruit and place people quickly. Just make sure you don’t drive your TCJ (total cost of jerks) for your organisation.

going exclusive

Thursday, May 31st, 2007

Ross Clennett from Ingenius Coaching explains agency consultants in a recruiter daily article how they can convince hiring managers to go exclusive with them. From the article, clients need to be explained that:

- Multi-listing potentially devalues the job in the market and potentially devalues the brand of the employer
- Quantity becomes more important than finding the best candidate (e.g. consultants flogging CV’s only to be seen doing something)
- The client does more work and still pays the same fee
- The client does more work, resents it and starts to cut corners
- Exclusivity gives the recruiter time to do a thorough job to find the best candidate
- The reality is that all recruiters give priority to exclusive jobs
- The best candidates are put forward to exclusive jobs
- Other professions don’t do it

Text in brackets is mine.

He finally requests not to ask exclusivity for exclusivity’s sake (i.e. do the best for the client based on the circunstances)

I am sure recruiters can corroborate or not if this reasoning will get their clients to say ‘hmmm… ok! I will work only with you’.

Assumming clients know all this already, I’d say that the reason why clients opt for a portfolio approach is because they do not know which vendor is going to present them the most hireable candidate; this is how we go about making other decisions when outcome uncertainty is a factor, right?; investment in shares may be a good example (you don’t know which company will give you the best/desired returns)

Agency consultants themselves balance their options to source the right person for the client’s assignment. They run their databases, go to all the job boards, put the ad on the paper if they can afford it, etc. Again, they are trying to counter uncertainty by increasing coverage.

You could be rightly arguing that the chosen options are already coming from a pre-screened pool of vendors (e.g. the largest agencies, or the most trafficked websites). Even with this in mind, I put to you that lack of exclusivity stems from the vendor’s lack of offering differentiation, at least in the eyes of the paying customer. In this context, recruiters need to stand out, whether it is by focusing on service breadth, depth, originality, etc.

If this reasoning is sound, then your capacity as a vendor to get your clients to go exclusive with you is determined well before the client contacts you for your services; this perception was set when your customer understood what makes your product unique.

Now you tell me, is this a sissy theoretical argument and there’s no room for differentiation in the recruitment space? Do your customers care if you have a stand out offering? Do you bother in trying to lock in a client, and if yes what’s the clincher?

Have a good weekend

My notes on biz strategy and analysis

Wednesday, May 30th, 2007

My sitewatch posts, usually comprising a top level summary of the features, benefits, perceived flaws and strengths, etc of new players in the recruitment, sourcing, hr space; elicit a healthy doses of ancillary comments. Recent threads from readers got me thinking as to the evolution of a business idea into a more formal plan and the model that will support it.

I may have a post-grad qualification but I am hardly your “let’s run the business idea through Dr. Pete’s 15-force revenue matrix as we learned it in the business strategy course” kind of guy. Having said that, during the summer holiday I had the chance to read blue ocean strategy, by W. Chan Kim and Renee Mauborgne.

I found the book appealing. It may have had to do that I loved picking up a book for grown-ups after so many Dr Seuss stories (yes, they also have a message for adults), but it definitely had its own merits too. I am also running a project that consists of the conception of a new business, and the book’s core premises were easy to integrate into the stated business vision, as opposed to the other way around.

As i was jogging my memory to remember the book’s ideas, I jotted down some of them, and thought I’d share them around in case it helped you. I also added a few things in brackets as if this was going to be used for an idea in the HR, recruitment vertical for illustration purposes. Here is it:

The idea behind ‘Blue Ocean’ is to develop and nurture a new market space, which is currently uncontested. Blue Ocean is the opposite of ‘bloody/red seas’ strategies that send companies to compete in highly contested markets, riddled with cutthroat pricing and low differentiation

Blue Ocean produces ‘value innovation’ which consists on not being superior to your competitors but making your competition irrelevant via the creation of leap value for your buyers; this is not only the result of the application of new technologies but the also of ‘market pioneering’ and extreme cost reductions compared to other players

The 4 actions framework

Reduce – what service components should be reduced well below the industry standard because they are of little value to the client?

Eliminate – what service components should be eliminated given that they are of no value?

Create – what service elements have never been offered by the industry?

Increase – what service elements need to be increased because they are of high value?

Addressing these questions creates focus (what we do and who we serve) divergence (we are different to everyone else because of this) and compelling tagline.

Reconstructing Market Boundaries (helps you in conceiving new market spaces)

You need to stretch the market in terms of audience, delivery, offering, competition, substitutes, etc. How do you go about stretching the market?

- Look across alternative industries (e.g. cinemas and restaurants aiming to fulfill a need for ‘a night out’)

- Look across strategic groups within industries (e.g. online assessment providers vs. high-touch premium personalized services)

- Look across the chain of buyers and influencers (e.g. candidates, companies buying on behalf of professionals, influencers/bloggers/specialist journalists)

- Look across complementary offerings (franchises to drive self-employment)

- Look across functional or emotional appeal to buyers (do you need to add or remove rational/feeling components of your delivery, e.g. do you need to use glasses instead of paper cups on the interview room?)

- Look across time and aim to identify trends which are decisive to the business, that are irreversible, and have a clear trajectory (e.g. candidate shortages, work-life balances, population ageing)

Creating New Demand from non-customers by value-innovating

Non customers Tier 1: people who reluctantly buy from your industry (e.g. candidates who hate agencies but will deal with them because they have the jobs

Non customers Tier 2: people who outright refuse to deal with you (e.g. applicants that go for jobs directly to employers)

Non customers Tier 3: Unexplored non customers that the industry has not thought of them as customers (e.g. high-school students, self employed professionals)

Testing for a Blue Ocean Idea

There you go.