February 25, 2009 at 6:22 pm
· Filed under Job Boards, Job Seekers, Sourcing, Tools, best practice, networking, recruitment
Recruitment agencies are receiving less assignments from their clients
Recruiters – like all or most of us – need to stay busy or else. They start chasing ads
If they chase ads, they might as well have a candidates that can fill the role
In lieu of/addition to looking at their own databases, recruiters chasing ads opt to create their own sourcing/trawling posts
The incremental cost of posting the trawling job ads is negligible; recruiters may have already paid for them as part of their monthly contracts
Applications per ad are already up given our context
Candidates won’t get much attention, because the recruiter’s interest in them is contingent on the ad-chasing success ratio (which I would say is low)
Hiring companies are getting peeved with cold-calling consultants, which leads them to (if possible) write more and more generic ads so that they are not identified by ad-chasers
What’s in the horizon?
As contracts with job boards get renewed maybe there will be less ads (both good and bad, but proportionally less bad ones)
Reduced confidence on recruiters will lead job seekers to going back to job seeking via people you can trust, which can also include hand-picked recruiters, but also colleagues, friends, family.
Referrals based on trawling ads will not produce results.
Niche sites that have the inclination and capacity to monitor the quality of job ads could also get the thumbs up. Issue here is: what’s quality? An ad for a work-from-home scheme? The fifth version of the same ad? A suspicious looking/fake one? The more judgment you apply the more labor-intensive / costly the exercise.
Hiring organisations have an opportunity to work on their employer brand during this time, A ‘grey’ recruitment practice does not necessarily imply low candidate quality.
Thank you @jobadder for your comments re. niche sites
Hope your week finishes very well
Permalink
July 3, 2008 at 5:35 pm
· Filed under People, Tools, linkedin, networking
Throughout my time as a LinkedIn user, I have received a large number of invitations to connect. Every one of these invitations can be grouped in three categories that are represented with the following real and recent examples:
Example 1:
Jorge
I’d like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn.
-Joe
Example 2:
Jorge,
I am reaching out to you as a fellow member of (another online network).
I would love to connect with you to share networks.
I do understand that you might choose not to accept my invitation. If that is the case please ARCHIVE the invitation instead of saying you don’t know me.
I appreciate your time.
- Joe
Example 3
Jorge
I’d like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn. We are connected through a number of different people and the X Talent Conference group and I was impressed when I saw your profile. I am seeking to create a powerful network of fellow professionals from around the world that I can learn from, share with and develop best practice to use every day. I thank you for your consideration.
-Joe
What matters most to you?. Is it:
- How interested/beneficial it is for you to connect to Joe?
- The style of the invitation and how much ‘effort’ the inviter has made in producing a customised invitation?
- The fact that you don’t know Joe
Permalink
May 19, 2008 at 7:12 pm
· Filed under Companies, Sourcing, linkedin, networking
myhome is closing, as you know… 30-odd people seem destined to lose their jobs before the end of the financial year
By looking at my LinkedIn account, there are 12 people on the system (that I can see within my network anyway), most of which are IT professionals (architect, developer, product manager). I assume the technical team have worked with bleeding edge tools. I doubt they will be long term unemployed.
Go have a peek, and if you recruit any of them leave me a comment
Have a good Tuesday.
Permalink
December 9, 2007 at 10:48 am
· Filed under Companies, Sourcing, Talent, Tools, linkedin, networking, technology
Had you asked me at the beginning of the year: will you be in Vizag for business in 2007? I would have honestly said no.. but here I am. This is all part of the plot to justify why I have not been writing – or reading – blogs in the last couple of months or so. More details soon.
Anyhoo, I was reading today about how LinkedIn is not going to be bought by News… Just in case they change their minds and/or Nye stops playing cat and mouse, I reckon this is a fab purchase because it enables News to
a) move up the value chain re. employment [from classifieds (immediate placements) to relationships with professionals (workforce planning)]
b) nurture an interesting audience for its other advertising and content
So there
Have a great weekend
Permalink
October 29, 2007 at 11:23 pm
· Filed under Advertising, Job Boards, Sourcing, Tools, facebook, networking, recruitment, technology
From PC World, quite an uncommitted article but this in my view is just the tip of the iceberg. I will see if I can dig down a piece from the 90′s that said that job boards were kinda looking good at the time, though most of the candidates were still coming from print ads.
Permalink
July 2, 2007 at 6:08 pm
· Filed under Companies, People, Sourcing, Talent, Tools, aboutus, business, linkedin, networking, recruitment, research, technology
My first foray into empirical research as part of LatinOcean. It is really more a brief compilation on how recruiters are using the system in the region in an attempt to transcend the hype and the buzz.
Don’t go too hard on me re. sample sizes and statistical relevance; nevertheless I hope it is of benefit to some of you out there, and feel free to pass. Enjoy
Permalink
May 1, 2007 at 5:30 am
· Filed under blogging, networking, photoblog, technology
I was lucky to be invited as a blogger to cebit this time around. I had the opportunity to confirm a few things:
- there is in fact a blogger dress-code
- there is a blogger demeanor (“i must have been a journalist in a previous life”)
- wifi is never fast enough
- there’s never enough jelly bellys, i meant jelly beans to go around
Other than that boththe host and the idea sponsor were gracious and accommodating. Ah yes, and the show… lots of telco, voip, network, some rfid, some tablets, old-ish software all round, web hosting…
Exhibitors that had to do with recruiment/people/hr:
- recruitment systems who are launching a new version of their integrated management system in the next few months (no specifics, maybe we’ll catch with the GM and get a deeper scoop
- jobserve, maybe it was too early but there weren’t too many people around them
- support resort, get an hour of .net development out of India or the Philippines for 5 aussie bucks (!)
- ford and james, candidate assessment circa 1980, that was my impression after hearing the pitch anyway
i trust there’s more upbeat posts from the blogger peer group at bloggerzone.com.au
.. and a handful of pics
Permalink
April 26, 2007 at 5:01 am
· Filed under Companies, Tools, linkedin, networking, recruitment
The LinkedIn blog is open for business.
We know corporate blogs can work… or not. I will be following with interest and elaborate on it as it matures; I am certainly betting on LinkedIn’s global growth, and blogs could be one mechanism to help them reach wider and deeper beyond the US.
Hat tip to Mack Collier
Permalink