Archive for the ‘Talent’ Category

Checkster from alpha to pre-release access

Sunday, May 27th, 2007

A few months back I reported Checkster going on alpha testing. It is now open for access before release.

Checkster has a retail offering for individuals (candidates) and an offering to recruiters/hirers. Having seen products like those marketed by Insala, I did not find the tools used ‘brand new’; having said that, people might find some of the insights extracted from the reports useful to focus career or job seeking efforts.

On the b2b side, the twist is that these tools are being used in the recruitment process as an incremental source of reference checks, as opposed to when a professional is out-placed, undertaking company-sponsored career development, etc. I expect the value of having these assessments will be directly proportional to how they contribute to get the right individual for the job (measured in terms of tenure, performance on the role, etc.).

sitewatch 19/05 - Talent Spring

Friday, May 18th, 2007

TalentSpring, in beta mode during q2 2007

Founders: Bryan Starbuck, CEO - Andrew Boardman, Development Manager - ex-Microsofties, no recruitment pedigree (not that there’s anything wrong with that). Their bios on the site here

Tagline: wisdom of the crowd brought into the candidate selection processes

How it works: potential candidates enter their profiles, subject to voting on other peoples’ profiles. system algorithms are meant to pick candidates who put crappy scores. recruiters use these scores to spot top talent in their corresponding industries and pay to contact the people they like (recruiters need to enter a JD in the system)

Value prop for job seekers: you resume stands out in front of recruiters because it carries a user-generated score (the merit score)

Value prop for employers/recruiters: easier to spot top talent because of the - you guessed it - Merit score

Comments:Does it sound a bit like jobster to you? I am unsure how the merit score is a good assessor of the quality of the candidate, and if recruiters will rely on the score to make contact/interview decisions. Very early stages though.

Thank you to Kris for the tip

sitewatch 17/05 - careermarket

Thursday, May 17th, 2007

careermarket

CEO: Mark Norman, could not find anything about him online; anyone heard of him before?

Based in Neutral Bay, NSW

model: structured resume/profile search (candidates register against eligibility criteria), employer recruiter pays for profile info and contact

stated value prop from the website:

for the job seeker
# 15 minutes and you are in the job market…its easy
# The opportunities come to you!…no need to continually monitor job ads and post resumes
# The compatibility score ensures that you are an appropriate candidate for a job…you are not wasting any time on non applicable opportunities
# You are in control…only release your details to opportunities of interest to you
# You can view activity on your profile at any time
# You can remove or change your details at any time
# Its costs you nothing!

for the recruiter/employer
# Allow (sic) you to zero in on quality candidates…save (sic) you time
# Enables you to source candidates that may not be actively looking to make a change in employer
# More time and cost effective than placing an ad
# The compatibility score puts a science to recruitment
# Identifies quality candidates instantly
# Flexible payment options including pay as you go for sporadic users
# You can test the database without cost

Big promises as you can see.

Competitors: there’s really no resume search product in the country, is there? the better quality CV databases are still in the agencies’ walled gardens

Experience: the employer registration is broken at the mo; the job seeker registration is simple/basic/superficial. you need to enter your CV within the week

My comments:
- I doubt that this will appeal to people not looking for a job right now, specially if you need a CV as part of your profile
- If the opportunity match is based on the job seeker registration fields, i don’t think they are strong enough to produce a good match IMHO. There’s no info on other factors that can be used to match people to recruiter needs (e.g. CV indexing)
- Positive outlook for careermarket will not be helped by candidate shortages, recruiters’ increasing preferences for people that do not look for work on job boards (which I would say are the prime customers for careermarket)
- I could not see the “compatibility score” in action but if it does put the science in recruitment, well that’s going to be more valuable than jobs.com.au

more on recruit.net

Tuesday, May 8th, 2007

I had the chance to be email-viewed by Brett Iredale from Nowhiring on matters recruit.net. Give it a read, it might help understand a bit more the difference between a job board and a job search engine; you can also get the scoop on how it is partnering with one of the top three job boards in Oz.

And just to ensure that you know this has more than sentimental value, there is one hot lead out of the post.

Talent scouting in the US west coast, powered by Google Australia

Tuesday, May 1st, 2007

When I mention I’m an engineer in our Sydney office, I’m often greeted with looks of surprise: it seems many people aren’t aware of our Australian presence. Thus, it is with great pleasure that we are inviting engineers from Silicon Valley (or anywhere in California) to the Googleplex in Mountain View next Tuesday, 8 May for G’day Google: an evening (6-9 pm) open house event showcasing Google Australia…

… Working in the Sydney office is lots of fun and incredibly challenging. My desk looks over Darling Harbour, so it can sometimes be difficult to spend all day looking at a monitor.

from G’day California, organised by Google Australia, and intended to leverage off a particularly strong regional employer brand to reap talent for the co’s worldwide offices. My guess is they may recruit more yanks into Sydney than get expats to come back. Where’s your money on?