<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>LatinOcean - Digital Marketing Consulting &#187; twitter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.latinocean.com/blog/category/twitter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.latinocean.com/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 02:40:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Social Tools – The worst that could’ve happened to Recruitment?</title>
		<link>http://www.latinocean.com/blog/2009/12/01/social-tools-%e2%80%93-the-worst-that-could%e2%80%99ve-happened-to-recruitment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.latinocean.com/blog/2009/12/01/social-tools-%e2%80%93-the-worst-that-could%e2%80%99ve-happened-to-recruitment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 11:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jorge</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[best practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linkedin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recruitment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sourcing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.latinocean.com/blog/?p=325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe… In a recent post, @greg_savage reported that he had asked attendees of an RCSA event/roadshow for a quick show of hands about social tools usage. The results: a) 80% of recruiters have a LinkedIn account, whilst only 20% were using it ‘actively’ b) there was a very low take up of twitter (5-10% have <a href='http://www.latinocean.com/blog/2009/12/01/social-tools-%e2%80%93-the-worst-that-could%e2%80%99ve-happened-to-recruitment/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe…</p>
<p>In <a href="http://gregsavage.com.au/?p=596">a recent post</a>, <a href="http://twitter.com/greg_savage">@greg_savage</a> reported that he had asked attendees of an RCSA event/roadshow for a quick show of hands about social tools usage. The results:</p>
<p>a) 80% of recruiters have a LinkedIn account, whilst only 20% were using it ‘actively’<br />
b) there was a very low take up of twitter (5-10% have a handle)</p>
<p>You know what? If there were more ‘active’ recruiters on LinkedIn, or more consultants moving into twitter, the ‘damage’ might be even bigger.</p>
<p>What damage? </p>
<p>I went to <a href="http://twitter.com/coffeemornings">@coffeemornings</a> last Friday; I spoke to four peeps that had been approached by recruiters on LinkedIn that they had not heard from – let alone met – before; these peeps ranted about these recruiters effectively cold calling them, to either connect <em>and then</em> be referred to other LinkedIn members, or do the usual tyre-kicking (you happy in your job? kinda thing).</p>
<p>Some recruiters are using new(er) tools and combining them with old practices and old thinking. Big risk. </p>
<p>And big opportunities. </p>
<p>Recruiters that notice that LinkedIn is not a resume database or a Yellow Pages for candidates, will score; they will give themselves room to develop their brand as individual professionals and that of the firms the happen to be working for.</p>
<p>Recruiters that feel the disconnect between social tools and the ‘let&#8217;s put bums on seats’ way of recruitment, and are courageous enough to re-energise their practices in the eyes of clients and job seekers, will come on top. </p>
<p>Big risk. Big opportunities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.latinocean.com/blog/2009/12/01/social-tools-%e2%80%93-the-worst-that-could%e2%80%99ve-happened-to-recruitment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>my chirp on twitter</title>
		<link>http://www.latinocean.com/blog/2009/03/16/my-chirp-on-twitter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.latinocean.com/blog/2009/03/16/my-chirp-on-twitter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 13:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jorge</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[best practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.latinocean.com/blog/?p=305</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the industrial era, Big money was spent on Big research that spawned Big products; the early adopters for such wares (planes, guns, mainframes) were either governments or well-funded, large corporations. Subsequent to that, mass-production-driven economies of scale allowed for diminishing marginal production costs through automation, cheaper labour, amortisation of R&#038;D expenditure. The consumerisation of <a href='http://www.latinocean.com/blog/2009/03/16/my-chirp-on-twitter/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the industrial era, Big money was spent on Big research that spawned Big products; the early adopters for such wares (planes, guns, mainframes) were either governments or well-funded, large corporations.  Subsequent to that, mass-production-driven economies of scale allowed for diminishing marginal production costs through automation, cheaper labour, amortisation of R&#038;D expenditure. The consumerisation of products was the result of its massification.</p>
<p>In the post-industrial period, comparatively small investments of time and money are dedicated to launch new tools and services that are firstly thrown into the hands of individual users, generally for little or no money. When this offering reaches or gets close to the proverbial tipping point, corporations and governments start to pay attention. Consumerisation effectively acts as a huge proof of concept.</p>
<p>The first example that comes to mind is ICQ; it supposedly started with pimply kids flirting and talking about music, right? Next thing, intranet based IM applications are vanilla services in business. Same for P2P, even email if you want to go that far back. The music discussions and flirting (may be) are gone but the <em>design</em> stayed.</p>
<p>So, next time you feel like rolling your eyes when someone tweets what she had for breakfast, may I kindly suggest you have <a href="http://www.stellaartois.com/">a Stella</a>, relax and reflect that in all likelihood the trivial stuff (maybe) will fade away from twitter, but its infrastructure will certainly remain.<img src="http://www.latinocean.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/Twitter-Bird-150x150.png" alt="Twitter-Bird" title="Twitter-Bird" width="150" height="150" class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-323" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.latinocean.com/blog/2009/03/16/my-chirp-on-twitter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

